Sometimes you have time to dig deeper and then you want to see where the throttle was or whether there was a confidence braking incident. We are not pro drivers and most of the time it's clear where the user error occurred. When I watch smartycam the only thing I can think about is the horrible quality.Īlso, I don't overlay data to every single session. Having video recorded with overlaid data while allowing you to use good quality video would be a game changer. Besides, they would charge the exact same amount for the videoless smartycam 'box', which I would be happy to buy anyway. I do have an HPTuners dongle for my tune, so maybe I'll fiddle with Race Render sometime.Įveryone has their ecosystems, so why would they want to make it easy for you to use someone else's? AIM gets nothing when you dump data to use with RaceRender and a GoPro.īecause they would play to their strengths, which is data, and depart a market where they are 15 years behind. BMW M135i vs Mercedes AMG-E63 T-Model +100-200 Autobahn Insta360 ONE X DriveAnalyser RaceRender 4k YouTube / markymark666 RaceRender Videos. I still use a GoPro 8 in conjunction and then just edit with DaVinci Resolve. But it does get the job done and the data being embedded in the video file makes it stupid-easy to analyze. Even in 2015 when it launched, it looked pretty lousy. I feel the pain, the C7 Corvette's PDR camera is of similar garbage quality. That being said, better video quality will probably uncover some more nuance in what's happening, but being able to see car placement on the track, hand movement, mirrors, etc. The video footage is good enough for analysis and deconstructing laps, the primary use case is not people wanting to impress friends on YouTube. Well worth RaceRender busting my chops every once in a while I use 4k60fps on the GoPro, it is night and day vs a Smart圜am. It looks so horrible I can't concentrate on the video. Sometimes I warm up to the idea of a Smart圜am, but then I see a video from one and it is beyond horrible. They will never be able to compete with GoPro. I would pay $1500 for that, any day of the weekĪIM's strength is not cameras. I would like them to build a unit that accepts a HDMI input from a gopro and overlays data on it automatically. But as I said it was a prototype.I was at AIM not long ago and brought this topic up. The GT4 race version is fairly successful so the base should be ok. They showed me whatever I wanted to see but I had to visit more nice cars this day But I didn't pay attention to details like pushrod. Is it more like a ferrari 488 / mclaren 720s / porsche gt2rs / huracan (performante?) or more hardcore like a radical RXC GT (which are obviously much faster on track, even than the hypercar class like 918/p1 etc) I also dont know where to place this car. How the car looks is not that important imho (as all its competitors probably look better, looking at ferrari's and lamborghini's), but the tech could be if its heritage/origins lies in racing. Twin plate clutch is also not a 'standard' automotive part. For instance a koenigsegg, or a porsche carrera GT or Spyker C8 has that but a 918 or laferrari hasnt.Īnd I think competitors in his priceclass (mclaren 720s, ferrari 488 etc) also dont have that tech, so its a pretty special feature to see for someone who is interested in the engineering side of supercars. On their site they say it has adjustable pushrod suspension. Yes well for instance detailed pictures of the suspension setup and such would be interesting. I got some technical information, too as I spoke to the test driver. If you're really interested I could additionally post some unedited fotos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |